Free Preview: lessons 1 to 3 of every course and extra, in every grade. No account, no ads. See this year’s offers
Goal100™LEARNING

← Co-teaching guide · Worked examples · Teacher Center

Teacher Center · Co-teaching

Co-teaching models, step by step

The six co-teaching models, one at a time: what each one is, when it fits English learners and students with IEPs, who does what before, during and after class, a 45-minute ENL + ELA lesson for each (made-up class), what goes wrong and how to fix it, and a 6-week plan to grow from "one teach, one assist" to stronger models.

Example with made-up class Every lesson on this page uses the same invented class: Grade 6 ELA with Integrated ENL, 26 students, 45-minute period. Seven students are English learners (2 Entering, 2 Emerging, 2 Transitioning, 1 Expanding); some students have IEPs. Unit: theme in a short story. Content objective: "I can state a theme and give two pieces of evidence." Language objective: "I can write a claim using 'The theme is ... because ...'." No real school, teachers or students.

Before you pick a model

  • Plan together first. NYSED's ENL co-teaching brief: "There is no co-teaching unless lessons are collaboratively planned and implemented."
  • Mix models in one period. NYSED's Topic Brief 4 says none of the models "should be used for an entire class period," and pairs often combine two or more. Every 45-minute example here does that.
  • Choose by the lesson and the students. Pick models by the lesson objective and what students need, not by habit.
  • Who is in the room. Integrated ENL: a dually certified teacher, or a certified ESOL teacher and a certified content teacher who co-teach (8 NYCRR §154-2.2(q)). ICT: at least a special education teacher and a general education teacher (8 NYCRR §200.6(g)). Each English learner's ENL minutes depend on English level (8 NYCRR §154-2.3(h)); one unit of study is at least 180 minutes a week.
  • Grow smaller groups. Station, parallel and alternative teaching make each teacher's group smaller, so students get more turns. Team teaching and one teach, one observe/assist keep one large group.

Rules and room diagrams in short: co-teaching guide. Partnership not working? When co-teaching is not working.

Two ways to name the models

Most US schools use the six approaches described by Lynne Cook and Marilyn Friend. NYSED's Integrated ENL briefs, written by Andrea Honigsfeld and Maria Dove, describe seven models for ENL co-teaching. They overlap. The "closest match" column is our own reading, not an official crosswalk.

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

Cook and Friend (six approaches)Honigsfeld and Dove, NYSED ENL briefs (seven models): closest matchGroup size per teacher (class of 26)
One teach, one observeOne Group: One Teaches, One Assesses26 to 1 leader
One teach, one assistOne Group: One Leads, One "Teaches On Purpose"26 to 1 leader
Station teachingMultiple Groups: Two Monitor and Teachabout 9 (26 ÷ 3 ≈ 8.7)
Parallel teachingTwo Groups: Two Teach the Same Content13 (26 ÷ 2)
Alternative teachingTwo Groups: One Pre-Teaches, One Teaches Alternative Information; Two Groups: One Reteaches, One Teaches Alternative Information20 and 6 (20 + 6 = 26)
Team teachingOne Group: Two Teach the Same Content26 to 2 leaders

1. One teach, one observe

What it is: One teacher leads the lesson while the other gathers specific observation data (Cook & Friend). It is not just walking around: the observer decides ahead of time what to watch and how to record it, and the pair looks at the data together afterward.

NYSED's ENL co-teaching brief (Honigsfeld and Dove) closest match: One Group: One Teaches, One Assesses (closest match).

One teach, one observe: room layoutTeacher A at the board teaches all students in rows. Teacher B sits at the side with a clipboard; four chosen students are circled.AB

A = ELA (content) teacher · B = ENL teacher

When to use it
  • With English learners (Integrated ENL): At the start of a unit or the year, to learn how English learners at each level use academic language: who speaks, which words they use, where they stop. Collect evidence for a language objective.
  • In ICT: To gather data on IEP goals (for example, on-task behavior, using a checklist) or for a behavior plan. NYSED's Q&A says both ICT teachers share evaluation for all students.

Who does what

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

Before classDuring classAfter class
Pick 3 to 5 focal students (mixed: English learners and others) and one thing to watch. Make a tally sheet or a quote log.A teaches. B records data quietly; does not interrupt or help unless safety requires it.10-minute debrief within 24 hours: what the data shows, one change for tomorrow. Next time switch roles.

45-minute ENL + ELA example Example with made-up class

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

MinutesTeacher A (ELA)Teacher B (ENL)Students
0-5Do Now: both circulate and greetAnswer: "What lesson did the main character learn?"
5-17A teaches mini-lesson: topic vs. theme, with a modelB observes 4 focal students: tallies use of "theme," "evidence," "because"Listen, turn and talk twice
17-35A and B confer with partnersB starts with focal students using the notesPartner reading; underline evidence
35-42A reads the exit ticket aloudB hands frames to anyone who asksExit ticket: claim + 1 piece of evidence
42-45A closesB names one strong "because" sentence heard (no names)Pack up

What goes wrong, and the fix

What goes wrongFix
Observer becomes a helper halfway through.Agree before class: observe for 12 minutes, then switch to conferring.
Data is never looked at.Put a 10-minute debrief on the calendar before the lesson.
The same teacher always observes.Alternate each time you use the model.

2. One teach, one assist

What it is: One teacher does most of the instruction while the other assists students with their work (Cook & Friend). NYSED's ENL brief says many teams limit this to 5 to 10 minutes a lesson and warns it can become the "go-to" when there is no time to plan.

NYSED's ENL co-teaching brief (Honigsfeld and Dove) closest match: One Group: One Leads, One "Teaches On Purpose".

One teach, one assist: room layoutTeacher A at the board teaches all students. Teacher B moves around the room helping students.AB

A = ELA (content) teacher · B = ENL teacher

When to use it
  • With English learners (Integrated ENL): Short stretches when English learners need a quick word, a frame card or a visual right at the moment of new content. The assisting teacher "teaches on purpose" (planned mini-supports), not random help.
  • In ICT: Short stretches when several students need prompts or a check (for example refocusing prompts listed on IEPs). Plan which accommodations the assisting teacher delivers.

Who does what

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

Before classDuring classAfter class
Decide the 2 or 3 planned supports the assisting teacher brings (frames, word cards, visuals) and which students get them first.A leads 10 minutes or less. B gives the planned supports, checks work, notes who needs more.Swap leads next lesson. Use B's notes to form tomorrow's small group.

45-minute ENL + ELA example Example with made-up class

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

MinutesTeacher A (ELA)Teacher B (ENL)Students
0-5B leads the Do Now: 3 key words with picturesMatch words to pictures
5-15A models finding a theme in paragraph 1 (think-aloud)B hands frame cards to Entering and Emerging students and points to the word wallWatch, then try paragraph 2 with a partner
15-35A confers with half the roomB confers with the other halfWrite a claim with the frame "The theme is ... because ..."
35-42A collects exit ticketsB reads the question aloud again for anyone who asksExit ticket
42-45B leads the closingShare one claim

What goes wrong, and the fix

What goes wrongFix
It becomes the whole period, every day.Cap it at 10 minutes; use the 6-week plan on this page.
Students see one "real" teacher.The assisting teacher leads the Do Now or closing every day.
The assisting teacher has nothing planned.Write the 2 or 3 supports into the plan.

3. Station teaching

What it is: The pair divides the content into parts; students rotate between a station with each teacher and an independent station (Cook & Friend). It needs a medium amount of planning.

NYSED's ENL co-teaching brief (Honigsfeld and Dove) closest match: Multiple Groups: Two Monitor and Teach (closest match).

Station teaching: room layoutThree groups: Teacher A runs one station, Teacher B runs another, and one station is independent. Arrows show groups rotating.ABon your own

A = ELA (content) teacher · B = ENL teacher

When to use it
  • With English learners (Integrated ENL): When a lesson splits into parts: vocabulary and frames with the ENL teacher, close reading with the content teacher, practice on their own. Every English learner gets small-group time with both teachers.
  • In ICT: Every student meets both teachers in groups of about 9; IEP accommodations (read-aloud, chunked text) can be built into a station.

Who does what

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

Before classDuring classAfter class
Split the lesson into 3 parts. Make the independent station something students can do without help. Make mixed groups (not "the ENL group").A and B each teach their station 3 times. Use a timer and one signal for rotating.Compare notes from each station; regroup for next time from the data.

45-minute ENL + ELA example Example with made-up class

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

MinutesTeacher A (ELA)Teacher B (ENL)Students
0-5A gives directions and the timer signalB shows where each group goesFind your group (9, 9, 8)
5-16Station 1: find two pieces of evidence in the textStation 2: theme words and the claim frameStation 3 (on your own): listen to the story audio and sketch the theme
16-27Station 1, group 2Station 2, group 2Rotate
27-38Station 1, group 3Station 2, group 3Rotate
38-43A reads the exit ticketB supports Entering students with the frameExit ticket
43-45Both closeClean up

What goes wrong, and the fix

What goes wrongFix
Rotation takes too long.Practice the routine on an easy day first; one signal, a visible timer.
Independent station gets stuck.Use work students have already practiced; post a picture checklist.
Groups are always "the ELLs" and "the rest."Mix groups; regroup every week from data.

4. Parallel teaching

What it is: Each teacher teaches half of the students the same material at the same time (Cook & Friend). It halves the group size, so students get more turns to talk.

NYSED's ENL co-teaching brief (Honigsfeld and Dove) closest match: Two Groups: Two Teach the Same Content.

Parallel teaching: room layoutThe class is split into two halves of about 13. Teacher A teaches the left half and Teacher B teaches the right half the same lesson.AB

A = ELA (content) teacher · B = ENL teacher

When to use it
  • With English learners (Integrated ENL): Discussions and writing where English learners need more chances to speak with a smaller group (13 instead of 26). Split English learners across both halves so each half has peer language models.
  • In ICT: Review before a test, labs, and discussions; mix students with and without IEPs in each half.

Who does what

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

Before classDuring classAfter class
Plan together so both halves have the same objective, the same task and the same exit ticket. Both teachers know the content and the frames.Each teacher teaches 13 students. Keep the voice volume down; sit groups far apart.Compare the two halves' exit tickets. If one half did better, find out what that teacher did differently.

45-minute ENL + ELA example Example with made-up class

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

MinutesTeacher A (ELA)Teacher B (ENL)Students
0-3B gives directions for both halvesMove to your half (13 and 13)
3-33A leads half 1: read, discuss theme, model the claim (3 or 4 English learners in this half)B leads half 2: the same lesson (3 or 4 English learners in this half)Discuss in pairs; each student speaks at least twice
33-40A supports writingB supports writingWrite a claim with evidence
40-45Both bring the halves togetherTwo volunteers share; exit ticket

What goes wrong, and the fix

What goes wrongFix
The two halves learn different things.Use one shared plan and one exit ticket.
One half is "the IEP half" or "the ENL half."Mix both halves every time.
Too noisy.Turn the halves to face away from each other; use quiet signals.

5. Alternative teaching

What it is: One teacher works with a small group while the other works with the larger group (Cook & Friend). Use it to pre-teach, re-teach or extend. Change the group often and switch roles.

NYSED's ENL co-teaching brief (Honigsfeld and Dove) closest match: Two Groups: One Pre-Teaches (or Reteaches), One Teaches Alternative Information.

Alternative teaching: room layoutTeacher A teaches a large group of about 20 in rows. Teacher B works with a small group of 6 at a side table.AB

A = ELA (content) teacher · B = ENL teacher

When to use it
  • With English learners (Integrated ENL): Pre-teach key words and a frame before a hard text. NYSED's brief warns that students who are always pulled for pre-teaching may feel labeled, so group by recent class work, not by English level alone, and include others.
  • In ICT: Re-teach a skill to a small group that shows "not yet" on an exit ticket, or extend for students who are ready.

Who does what

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

Before classDuring classAfter class
Use yesterday's exit tickets to choose 4 to 7 students. Plan what the large group does at the same time.B teaches the small group for about 10 minutes; A leads the large group.Check the small group's exit tickets. Next time the other teacher takes the small group.

45-minute ENL + ELA example Example with made-up class

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

MinutesTeacher A (ELA)Teacher B (ENL)Students
0-5A leads the Do NowB calls a small group of 6 (4 English learners, 2 others, from exit tickets)Do Now
5-15A reviews yesterday's chapter with 20 studentsB pre-teaches 6 key words and the claim frame to 6 students (20 + 6 = 26)Large group: summary; small group: words and frame
15-35A and B circulateB checks the small group firstPartner reading and claim writing
35-42A reads the exit ticketExit ticket
42-45B closesShare one claim

What goes wrong, and the fix

What goes wrongFix
The same students are always in the small group.Regroup from each week's data; include students without labels.
The small group misses what the large group learns.Large group does review or practice, not new content.
Only the ENL or special education teacher takes the small group.Switch roles.

6. Team teaching

What it is: Both teachers are actively involved in leading the lesson; neither one is clearly in charge (Cook & Friend). It is the most complex model and needs the most planning and trust.

NYSED's ENL co-teaching brief (Honigsfeld and Dove) closest match: One Group: Two Teach the Same Content.

Team teaching: room layoutBoth teachers stand at the front and lead the whole class together, taking turns speaking.ABclaimevidence?

A = ELA (content) teacher · B = ENL teacher

When to use it
  • With English learners (Integrated ENL): Modeling academic conversation: one teacher makes a claim, the other asks "What is your evidence?" English learners hear the exact language before using it.
  • In ICT: Introducing a big idea; showing two ways to solve a problem. Pair it with smaller-group models on other days, since it does not shrink the group.

Who does what

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

Before classDuring classAfter class
Script the key exchange together. Decide who says what and the frame you will both use.Both lead. Take turns; build on each other's words.Reflect: did students use the language you modeled? What will you model next time?

45-minute ENL + ELA example Example with made-up class

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

MinutesTeacher A (ELA)Teacher B (ENL)Students
0-5A states a claim about the themeB asks, "What is your evidence?" and models the frameWatch the model talk
5-15A reads a paragraph aloudB thinks aloud: picks evidence and says the claim with the frameRead along; underline
15-30Both circulateBoth circulatePairs act out the same talk with frames
30-40Both conferBoth conferWrite the claim and evidence
40-45Both collect exit ticketsExit ticket

What goes wrong, and the fix

What goes wrongFix
One teacher talks the whole time.Script turns; switch who starts.
Used every day.Mix with station, parallel or alternative teaching so groups get smaller.
Not enough planning.Save team teaching for days after a real co-planning meeting.

From "one teach, one assist" to stronger models in 6 weeks

Example with made-up numbers The pair tracks "two-leader minutes": minutes a week when both teachers lead a group (station, parallel, alternative, team, or B leading part of the lesson). The class meets 5 days × 45 minutes = 225 minutes a week.

Swipe the table sideways to see every column →

WeekModel focusWhat the pair doesTwo-leader minutes
Week 1One teach, one observe + one teach, one assist (switch leads daily)Sign the co-teaching agreement; B leads the Do Now every day (5 min); one 20-minute observe block on focal students.25 of 225 min ≈ 11%
Week 2Add station teaching onceStations on Wednesday (33 minutes of two-leader time) plus Do Nows.55 of 225 min ≈ 24%
Week 3Add parallel teaching for discussionOne parallel discussion (30 min) + stations (33 min) + Do Nows.80 of 225 min ≈ 36%
Week 4Add alternative teaching from exit-ticket dataPre-teach group (10 min) twice; stations; parallel; Do Nows.100 of 225 min ≈ 44%
Week 5Add a team-taught openerTwo team openers (10 min each) on top of week 4.120 of 225 min ≈ 53%
Week 6Choose the mix that workedLook at exit tickets by model; keep one teach, one assist to 10 minutes or less a lesson.135 of 225 min ≈ 60%
The math, step by step:
  1. Week 1: 25 ÷ 225 = 0.111, so about 11%.
  2. Week 6: 135 ÷ 225 = 0.60, so 60%.
  3. Change: 135 − 25 = 110 more minutes a week with two leaders.

Each week, in order

  1. Monday planning (20 to 40 minutes): pick the week's models from last week's data, using the weekly co-planning form.
  2. Teach: both teachers lead something every day, even if only the Do Now or the closing.
  3. Friday check (10 minutes): sort exit tickets by "got it" and "not yet"; note which model was used.
  4. Decide: keep what worked, change one thing. Ask a coach to visit in week 4 with the look-fors checklist.

If the move stalls because of planning time, scheduling or roles, see when co-teaching is not working.

Sources

  1. Cook, L. and Friend, M. (2004). Co-Teaching: Principles, Practices and Pragmatics (handbook, posted by the Kentucky Department of Education, PDF) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  2. NYSED OBEWL: Topic Brief Four, Seven Models of Co-Teaching, Dove and Honigsfeld (PDF) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  3. NYSED OBEWL: Topic Brief 2, Co-Teaching in an Integrated ENL Classroom (PDF) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  4. NYSED OBEWL: Topic Brief Five, The Role of School Administrators (PDF) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  5. 8 NYCRR §154-2.2(q), personnel qualified to teach integrated ENL (Justia copy) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  6. 8 NYCRR §154-2.3(h), units of study by English level (Justia copy) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  7. NYSED: Units of Study Glossary (PDF) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  8. 8 NYCRR §200.6(g), integrated co-teaching services (Cornell LII copy) (checked Nov 8, 2026)
  9. NYSED: Continuum of Special Education Services, Q&A (updated Nov 2013, PDF) (checked Nov 8, 2026)

The six approaches are described by Lynne Cook and Marilyn Friend; the seven ENL models by Andrea Honigsfeld and Maria Dove for NYSED. Short quoted phrases come from those documents. All lesson plans, numbers, wording and room drawings on this page are Goal100 originals.

Teacher Center · co-teaching models step by step · last checked Nov 8, 2026.